CHAPTER IIMISHNAH 1. IF A WOMAN WHO1 WAS PRESERVING VEGETABLES2 IN A POT TOUCHED3 A PROJECTING LEAF OUTSIDE THE POT ON A DRY SPOT,4 EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS AN EGG'S BULK5 IN THE LEAF,6 IT ALONE BECOMES UNCLEAN7 WHILE ALL THE REST8 REMAINS CLEAN.9 IF SHE TOUCHED IT10 AT A WET SPOT11 AND THERE WAS AN EGG'S BULK5 IN THE LEAF,6 ALL12 BECOMES UNCLEAN.13 IF THERE WAS NOT AN EGG'S BULK5 IN IT,14 IT ALONE BECOMES UNCLEAN BUT ALL THE REST REMAINS CLEAN. IF IT IS RETURNED INTO THE POT, ALL15 BECOMES UNCLEAN.16 IF THE WOMAN WAS UNCLEAN17 OWING TO CONTACT WITH ONE WHO CONTRACTED CORPSE UNCLEANNESS,18 AND SHE TOUCHED THE LEAF EITHER AT A WET SPOT OR AT A DRY SPOT, ALL19 BECOMES UNCLEAN IF THERE WAS AN EGG'S BULK IN THE LEAF;20 BUT IF THERE WAS NOT AN EGG'S BULK21 IN IT, IT ALONE BECOMES UNCLEAN AND ALL THE REST REMAINS CLEAN. IF A WOMAN WHO WAS A TEBULATH YOM22 EMPTIED OUT THE POT WITH UNWASHED23 HANDS,24 AND SHE OBSERVED SOME LIQUID ON HER HANDS, AND IT IS UNCERTAIN WHETHER IT WAS SPLASHED FROM THE POT OR WHETHER A STALK25 HAD TOUCHED HER HANDS, THE VEGETABLES ARE INVALID26 BUT THE POT REMAINS CLEAN.27
MISHNAH 2. R. ELIEZER RULED: HE WHO EATS FOOD OF FIRST[GRADE UNCLEANNESS28 CONTRACTS] FIRST [GRADE UNCLEANNESS]; [HE WHO EATS FOOD OF] SECOND [GRADE UNCLEANNESS28 CONTRACTS] SECOND [GRADE UNCLEANNESS]; [IF IT WAS] THIRD[GRADE UNCLEANNESS HE CONTRACTS] THIRD [GRADE UNCLEANNESS]. R. JOSHUA RULED: HE WHO EATS FOOD OF FIRST[GRADE] OR OF SECOND [GRADE UNCLEANNESS CONTRACTS]SECOND [GRADE UNCLEANNESS]; [IF IT WAS] THIRD [GRADE UNCLEANNESS, HE CONTRACTS] SECOND [GRADE UNCLEANNESS] IN REGARD TO HOLY THINGS29 BUT NOT IN REGARD TO TERUMAH.30 ALL THIS APPLIES TO COMMON FOODSTUFFS THAT WERE PREPARED IN CONDITION OF CLEANNESS THAT ARE APPROPRIATE FOR TERUMAH.31
MISHNAH 3. FIRST [GRADE UNCLEANNESS] IN COMMON FOOD IS UNCLEAN AND CONVEYS UNCLEANNESS;32 SECOND [GRADE UNCLEANNESS]33 CONVEYS INVALIDITY34 BUT DOES NOT CONVEY UNCLEANNESS;35 AND THIRD [GRADE UNCLEANNESS]36 MAY BE EATEN IN A DISH MIXED WITH TERUMAH.37
MISHNAH 4. FIRST [GRADE] AND SECOND [GRADE UNCLEANNESS] IN TERUMAH ARE UNCLEAN AND CONVEY UNCLEANNESS;38 THIRD[GRADE UNCLEANNESS]39 CAUSES INVALIDITY40 BUT CONVEYS NO UNCLEANNESS; AND THE FOURTH [GRADE UNCLEANNESS]41 MAY BE EATEN IN A DISH CONTAINING HOLY FOOD.42
MISHNAH 5. FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD [GRADES OF UNCLEANNESS]IN HOLY FOODSTUFFS ARE UNCLEAN AND CONVEY UNCLEANNESS;40 THE FOURTH [GRADE OF UNCLEANNESS] IS INVALID43 AND CAUSES NO UNCLEANNESS; AND THE FIFTH [GRADE OF UNCLEANNESS]44 MAY BE EATEN IN A DISH CONTAINING CONSECRATED FOOD.
MISHNAH 6. SECOND [GRADE UNCLEANNESS] IN COMMON FOOD CONVEYS UNCLEANNESS TO UNCONSECRATED LIQUIDS45 AND CAUSES INVALIDITY TO FOODSTUFFS OF TERUMAH.THIRD [GRADE OF UNCLEANNESS] IN TERUMAH CONVEYS UNCLEANNESS TO CONSECRATED LIQUIDS45 AND CAUSES INVALIDITY TO HOLY FOODSTUFFS IF IT46 WAS PREPARED IN CONDITIONS OF CLEANNESS APPROPRIATE TO HOLY FOOD; BUT IF IT WAS ONLY PREPARED UNDER CONDITIONS OF CLEANNESS APPROPRIATE TO TERUMAH, IT CONVEYS UNCLEANNESS AT A FIRST AND AT A SECOND REMOVE, AND CAUSES INVALIDITY TO HOLY FOOD AT ONE ADDITIONAL REMOVE.47
MISHNAH 7. R. ELIEZER OBSERVED: THE THREE OF THEM48 ARE ON A PAR IN THE FOLLOWING CASES. THE FIRST GRADE OF UNCLEANNESS IN HOLY FOOD, IN TERUMAH OR IN COMMON FOOD CONVEYS UNCLEANNESS AT TWO REMOVES49 AND CAUSES INVALIDITY AT ONE ADDITIONAL REMOVES IN THE CASE OF HOLY FOOD; IT CONVEYS UNCLEANNESS AT ONE REMOVE50 AND CAUSES INVALIDITY AT ONE ADDITIONAL REMOVE47 IN THE CASE OF TERUMAH; AND IN COMMON FOOD IT ONLY CAUSES INVALIDITY.THE SECOND [GRADE OF UNCLEANNESS] IN THE CASE OF ALL OF THEM48 CONVEYS UNCLEANNESS AT ONE REMOVE47 AND CAUSES INVALIDITY AT ONE ADDITIONAL REMOVE51 AS REGARDS HOLY FOOD; IT CONVEYS UNCLEANNESS TO COMMON LIQUIDS45 AND CAUSES THE INVALIDITY OF FOODSTUFFS OF TERUMAH. THE THIRD GRADE [OF UNCLEANNESS] IN THE CASE OF ALL THESE52 CONVEYS UNCLEANNESS TO HOLY LIQUIDS53 AND CAUSES INVALIDITY TO HOLY FOODSTUFFS.
MISHNAH 8. IF A MAN EATS FOOD OF A SECOND [GRADE OF UNCLEANNESS52 HE MUST NOT WORK IN AN OLIVE-PRESS.54 COMMON FOODSTUFFS THAT WERE PREPARED UNDER CONDITIONS PROPER TO THE CLEANNESS OF CONSECRATED FOOD ARE STILL REGARDED AS COMMON FOOD.55 R. ELIEZER SON OF R. ZADOK RULED: THEY ARE REGARDED AS TERUMAH TO CONVEY UNCLEANNESS AT TWO REMOVES56 AND TO RENDER TERUMAH INVALID AT ONE ADDITIONAL REMOVE.57 - Next folio -
|